A grade you can understand.
Quality and value answer different questions. We show the sources, the weighting, and what is still unknown.
How good is the game?
GG Score combines independent perspectives on the experience. The letter grade is a readable expression of the same score.
Is this the moment to buy?
GG Value considers the purchase decision separately. A great game can still be worth waiting for at its current price.
What do we actually know?
Missing sources stay missing. Demonstration ratings never become verified reviews just because they are displayed precisely.
Every point has a place.
96/100 = 9.6/10. Same grade, two scales.
3 of 3 sources · Demonstration40% effective weight · 40% base weight
40% effective weight · 40% base weight
20% effective weight · 20% base weight
Weighted score = sum of available source scores × weights, divided by the sum of available weights. Rounded to the nearest point on a 100-point scale.
One scale. Clear thresholds.
- A+
- 95–100
- A
- 90–94
- A−
- 85–89
- B+
- 80–84
- B
- 70–79
- C
- Below 70
A separate recommendation.
The prototype uses a simple disclosed rule: a sample discount of 25% or more receives “Buy now”; otherwise, “Wait for sale.” This is a demonstration, not a production value model.
Production guidance needs verified prices, edition and platform details, price history, and player context. No “Skip” judgment is inferred from this simplified rule.
Trust takes more than a number.
All current scores, awards, prices, and review text are demonstration data. No professional reviewer, publisher, or creator is claimed to have contributed. AI analysis will require attributable, authorized evidence; it will not infer enjoyment from faces or playtime.
Source availability is not statistical confidence. A production score will need provenance, review dates, platform context, and a published editorial policy.